*Excuse my English grammar*
Things are always changing, just same as the Earth is always turning around.
When somehing has changed, it means we actually standing on new start line.
As we, our group designed our piece like a big chronicle gallery now we focusing on to some SHOES.
We know that people normally wearing (or putting?) a pair of shoes, but in an artistic form?
It’s simple but simple is a most difficult things to change…
We can make the grandstand as a Holocaust because of it is still remaind a theme of “War Time”.
Also, it creates an huge impact to audience even if it is a hard to look back.
Can we do like this?
[Image is avaliable at] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355086/Golden-Harvest-Poles-plundered-graves-turned-Jews-Nazis.html (accessed 1 April 2014)
However, should we just satisfy to create a ‘shock’ to audience?
How about mercy? how about a questioning for next generations?
We have to consider about ‘why are doing this’ all the time.
We can create any sort of atomosphere but performers are doing and audiense is watching us.
So, there is a paladox in between performer and audience; us, as a performer we are actually making the
atomosphere but it will not affect us. Because we are ‘doing’ but audience is ‘watching’ and it must be have got more impact.
The differences in between seeing and doing is actually throught our body but the differences are which part of body we are using and how majority of that. Author John Wylie stated that ‘body and environment fold into and co-construct each other through a series of practices and relations’ (Wylie, 2007, as quoted in Mike Pearson 2010) thus body and mind are always linking.
…to be continued.
Work Cited
Daily Male Reporter (2011), Poles ‘plundered mass graves and turned Jews over to the Nazis’, controversial book claims, Online:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355086/Golden-Harvest-Poles-plundered-graves-turned-Jews-Nazis.html (accessed 1 April 2014)
Person, Mike (2010) Site-Specific Performance, Hampshire/Palgrave Macmillian