Exploring the Space… Five Places – Fifty (ish) Words

Small cupboard down the stairs… Dusty, cold, dark, musty,echoes, orange, hurts to breathe in cold air, spiders webs, dark corners, rough, cold to touch, peeling paint, storage, juxtaposition of whats in the room to what it looks like, eerie, bare bricks, dirty, molding wood, old, claustrophobia, ghosts, ugly, neglected, dead and needs care.

Room with painting… Fireplace, rough and smooth, cold to touch, royal, patriotic, classy, old, used, worn, historic, mystery and memory, stage, 1917, 1930s/40s brickwork, A.M Hunter 2nd, beautiful painting and cold.

By the road… Noisy, disturbing, out of place, fields and pollution, spectacular views,horses, old,undisturbed, historic, performance, regal, open but fenced off, gated away, restricted, dated architecture.

Large main room… Mix of old and new, bright, warm and cold, light, out of place, airy, dusty, sloped roof, original and modified, individual mortuary, smells musty, damp, broken up by pillars, antique and tall.

Old kitchen… Damp, cold, musty, antique, memories and mystery, historic,old, smells old and dirty, unused, unhygienic, dark, spiders webs, unappreciated and un-kept.

A Question of Direction: How to Make a Footprint Heard Over the Sound of Hooves.

‘Am I purposefully lost in space, trying to get my bearings?’
Yes would have definitively been the answer before the session in week three. Now I only answer yes with some hesitancy, as I feel as if the space is starting to reveal it’s self to us, revealing it’s history, charm, struggle, loneliness, helplessness, willing and needs. As each one of these rounds the bend an canters into sight, it feels as if we are that much closer to understanding how we can draw attention to the things that the site speaks of, for it does speak, to each of us individually, instructing our decisions on performance whether consciously or not.
‘As I move around do I leave marks: ‘to walk is to leave footprints’ (Roms, quoted in Whitehead, 2006, p. 4)’

At risk of sounding like I am calling my classmates to arms, I will say that I feel that we are, on our journey, leaving ‘footprints’ and impressions on the site and the people who inhabited it long before we did. From things as little as a mother from the playgroup placing her hand on a pillar directly where a post-it note had resided the day before and wondering why it is sticky, to the memory the man walking his terriers will have of half of the group clambering along the railings of the courtyard area, to the litter which we may leave in the bins on a weekly basis, to a stray balloon making its way onto the sixth hole’s putting green. The final footprint we will leave, though, will be the performance, and as I grow more and more attached to the site, I feel that it is our duty, and my right to make known to others what the site has to offer today, and what it has offered in the past.
‘What are the circumstances of my presence? Am I a stranger or an inhabitant? Do I pass unnoticed or do I stick out? Are my actions clandestine or do I draw attention to myself?’
The answers to all of these questions will change the longer I spend time at the site, however, I feel that after reading Govan’s ‘Inhabited Spaces’ and ‘Architectural Spaces and the Haptic’, it wouldn’t be wise to forget that spectators will be asking themselves these questions and, at that time, will be reaching near opposite conclusions to us. Yi-Fu Tuan said that, ‘architectural space reveals and instructs’, with the suggestion that a cathedral (the building and parts thereof) becomes a symbol for the values it projects. In this light, whether the grandstand projects to us a feeling of loss, dilapidation, renovation, rejuvenation, hope, sorrow, misery, heartache, former glory or boredom, it is not a given fact that a spectator will see the same, meaning a performance with a high level of ambiguity is surely out of the question? The Grotowski example, which is provided in ‘Inhabited Spaces’, created a living environment in which spectators joined in, is this the way to draw an audience to the point of realising the subject and motive? The Reckless Sleepers example used the incongruity of an industrial backing and lavish tables dressed in period banquet style to heighten the irony of the space, is this a possibility to provide a  clear subject and motive? Or, do we look at this another way, do we want to be so ambiguous that the audience can draw their own conclusions? Is it an idea to ask in some way what exactly they got from the performance? Do we want our audience to feel every single emotion of alienation and the feeling they’re intruding or that they simply don’t belong?.
‘Who am I and what am I doing?’
[Answer to follow shortly]
References:
Govan, Emma (2007) Making a Performance. Coxon: Routledge P114-119.

Pearson, M. (2010) Site-Specific Performance. Palgrave Macmillan: London. P19.

My Drifting Imagination

My drift took me to places I have never seen before in Lincoln. As I walked through the harsh wind it became difficult to detach my thoughts from rationality; how cold it was, how physically tiring the walk had become, and how pointless the walk felt. However as I became more and more unfamiliar with my surroundings I began to lose myself into imagination.

It began with me walking in a completely different direction to my normal journeys. Along the way I saw buildings that I had never seen before. Somehow the further I got away from Lincoln, the more the architecture seemed to change. This led me to imagine the history of the buildings, who are the owners, how the derelict buildings had been so neglected, how I would change said buildings. As my imagination took over I began to imagine the lives of people living there, what occupations would amount to such accommodation. These scenarios played out in my head as I walked, creating somewhat of a performance in my head, forming imaginary relationships and characters.

After walking further down this road I encountered a train track, the sirens distracted me from my initial thoughts and I began to go on another journey. As the train passed I saw the faces of the passengers, I began to empathise with them; their boredom, excitement, and anxieties. Again I found myself creating characters in my mind. The businessman that is travelling his way from stop to stop, longing for home. The excited students returning home to see their families.

I then began to imagine my own home, the idea of living away and being an adult. It reminded me of a performance in itself, how I am performing everyday as a mature adult, how much my life has changed and as I walked home the idea that you can feel a connection to anyone began to overwhelm me.

The Grandstand: Then and Now

The Grandstand begins to feel less and less empty every week. The more I visit it the more interesting it becomes. I begin to feel its history. I long to learn its future. The more of a relationship I build with the building itself, the more inspiration I seem to get from it.

Initially the Grandstand felt like a dark, lonely place to me. I felt little connection to it. However the more I find out about it, the more I delve into its history, the more interested I become. For instance its horse racing pedigree. The fact that the main road used to be closed for horse racing astounds me still. The amount of cars that pass through that road every day and seem to pay no attention to the building itself. I feel a sense of irritation at their ignorance to its history, its architecture, its warmth. Little do they know the potential and history the Grandstand. The thought that that road was once considered entertaining, and now is polluted with people doing their daily errands makes me wonder how it could be returned to its former glory.

This makes me inspired to create a piece that completely rejuvenates the Grandstand. An idea that changes popular beliefs about the building as cold, dark and desolate. Instead making it seem more of a warm building, celebrating its past in a way that entertains, much like the horse racing of old. A piece that reminds the public of what the Grandstand used to be, how it is a vital part of Lincoln’s history. Rather than it just being the building they drive by on the way to work.

I also can’t help but think about the Grandstands future. Such a brilliant building with great rooms, a beautiful fireplace, and working facilities. The amount of space that seems wasted and empty. I would like to do something that fills these spaces entirely, to represent how I feel the Grandstand should be filled by something.

I can’t help believe that the Grandstand should be something more than it is, the fact it is in this almost middle ground frustrates me. A building with so much potential and history, I believe, should be used. This is why I want to create something that brings back some level of excitement to the Grandstand.

Unknown Importance (Part 2)- Progression

After visiting the Lincolnshire Archives, I felt I had a lot more to work with in terms of being inspired to create a performance within the Grandstand. The session on the site the next day began with a whole group writing task where we individually wrote letters to the Grandstand, about what we had learnt at the Archives, how we felt afterwards and our thoughts towards the site itself. Many members of the group wrote letters about how they learnt of the sites past and several uses and how this has made them feel a certain way. The activity after this task was to use the letters to create a collage of thoughts about and towards the building. To start with we got into groups of 3 or 4 and then later we worked together as a massive group where we all said a sentence of our letter in turns, creating a combination of many thoughts and ideas which linked really well and created an interesting dramatic atmosphere for us to work with. I think this task has a lot of potential to turn into a full group performance work.

Later in the session, we split into 2 smaller groups where the aim was to develop previous 2 ideas shown last week; one performing outside on the gates surrounding the site and one which I worked on which was to explore the use of the main space in relation to the original blueprint plans for that room to become a mortuary. When seeing a part of this work last week I felt some speech and maybe a situation/theme was needed to link the action together so taking inspiration in the realisation that the main room was going to be used a mortuary allowed this transition to take place.

A lot of what people had said in their first task letters related to the mortuary plans and specifically personal feelings about it, so to add some speech I thought it would be interesting to turn it into dialogue. We used sticky notes to gather and write down particular parts of letters that related to the mortuary and stuck them around the set which was created with around 50 chairs to create a war/destruction scene. I directed the group to combine the same elements of the performance last week like hiding their shoes and lying down within the set as well as adding in some new concepts such as picking one of the sticky notes, saying it out loud and then sticking it to themselves to symbolise a mortuary tag.

IMG_2554IMG_2555

 

When we performed this to the other group, during the end of the piece the performers in the group laid down side by side like dead bodies in the kitchen area, I led the spectators into this area which we had decided on as it is on the mortuary plans as the ‘Viewing Room’, a place where family would view the main room to identify their past loved ones. This piece overall was shown as a re-enactment of the situations that could have possibly happened years ago, as well as adding in contemporary dialogue and thought process. In relation to my previous post, this piece along with many others to follow was heavily reliant on the documents and pictures that were discovered in the Archive, showing the high importance of historical backgrounds of a site.

‘Where physical traces of a building’s past operate metaphorically to render absent present and function to introduce the spectator into other worlds and dimensions of our world that are other. The material traces evoke worlds that are intangible and unlocatable: worlds of memory, sensation, imagination, affect and insight’ (Irwin, 2007, p. 37) in (Pearson, 2010, p. 10)

References

Irwin, K. (2007) The Ambit of Performativity: How Site Makes Meaning in Site- Specific Performance. PhD. University of Art and Design: Helsinki in Pearson, M (2010) Site Specific Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillian.