Talking SENSE

‘Offers them opportunity to open their senses to the land they are living in/on, and participate, physically immerse in it. It invites them to pay attention to what they pay attention to.’ (Taylor, 2008, p. 140)

In everyday life, we naturally use our senses to get by. We use them to see, hear, taste, smell and feel the world around us. It’s instinctive. However, in relation to theatre, the exploration and experimentation of these senses is quite intriguing as well as extremely challenging for a performer, director and audience member. Theatre is normally regarded as a visual and auditory art, whether that’s concentrated on performers in a physical dance piece or the elaborate set design of an award-winning production, intertwined with pieces of music and the spoken voice. During last week and into this week, we have all been learning how all five senses can be explored in relation to theatre and in particular, how we would incorporate this concept to our developing performances within this site.

After discussing the possibilities of fusing experimentation of the senses into our growing drama piece, the whole group were given the task to present a 5-10 minute piece in our next site visit which integrated our thoughts and ideas. We felt inspired by what we had learnt in lesson from various practitioners and companies performances so looked forward to adding this to our performance idea of ‘Waiting Room’ (More details about specific performances ideas to follow).

On site, we set out chairs as in the shape of a general waiting room, placing an envelope on the majority of chairs. These envelopes held instructions to the individual who chose to sit there, for example  ‘Open at 11.34am’ or ‘Open when you hear crying’ were written on the front of the envelope and inside another instruction would be given such as ‘Put the kettle on, pour water into mug and give to another audience member’.

imageimage (1)

The use of these envelopes allowed us to be in control of the piece and directly see how the notion of ‘senses’ could be an interesting part of the ‘Waiting Room’. Just from these 2 example instructions, the use of smell, touch, sight, audio and perhaps taste (depending if the audience member drank the coffee) are evident:

SIGHT: The dependence on keeping an eye on the clock to know when to open certain envelopes, to read the instructions given, to see the other audience members partaking in their tasks.

SMELL: The smell of coffee that was being made by an individual participant, the perfume we sprayed on the seats and envelopes before the audience members came in.

SOUND: Sound of kettle boiling, sound of crying, sound of scratching pens on a writing pad.

TOUCH: More to do with ‘feeling’- turning all the heaters off so that the room was uncomfortably cold. The contrast between the cold room and the hot coffee mug and individual was given.

TASTE: Again perhaps for an audience member who may drink the coffee.

After presenting to the class and receiving feedback, we felt that this concept is something that we would like to build upon because of how much it contributed to the atmosphere, creating an interesting dimension to the piece. Participants agreed with this and said that it gave a heightened atmosphere from the start due to the temperature of the room and pressure of fulfilling a given task. We could see for ourselves how this made audience members feel different (uncomfortable, unsafe, unsure) in comparison to viewing other performances, both individually and as a whole group of people.

Our main inspiration was Rotozaza’s ‘Etiquette’ due to the focus on an individual/pair’s reaction to the experimentation of their senses. This 30 minute ‘experience’ is an example of how auditory given tasks challenge the audience members by exposing ‘human communication at both it’s rawest and most delicate’ (Rotozaza, 2007) through the use of headphones.

shapeimage_2

Captured in Buenos Aires by Nicholas Goldberg.
Etiquette. Online: http://www.rotozaza.co.uk/etiquette2.html [Accessed on 10 March 2014]

‘If the line between audience and performer seems blurred, Rotozaza’s ‘Etiquette’ erases it entirely’ (ibid). Etiquette uses the participants as the entire basis for the performance and this is something that we wanted to make evident in our presentation. The whole 10 minute piece relied on our participants to open and fulfill their tasks which led to others opening their envelopes and so on. This brought quite a fresh atmosphere to the piece as a whole as nothing was completely definite, perhaps allowing for many exciting undefined circumstances.

To develop this concept in our idea of the ‘Waiting Room’, we will need to focus on more means of reacting with participant’s senses whilst considering about how this can relate to the context and content of our ideas and what we want to perform.

References:

Rotozaza (2007) Etiquette- Rotozaza’s Micro/Autoteatro Work, Online: http://www.rotozaza.co.uk/etiquette2.html [Accessed 10 March 2014]

Taylor, G (2008) Locating: Place and the Moving Body. PhD. Victoria University, AUS. Online: http://mams.rmit.edu.au/q6n0m9ah9rvcz.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2014]

Dear Grandstand

So it turns out you held an expo in 1969. Well it wasn’t technically within your walls but i bet you had a great view. I read a lot of interesting stuff about a fashion show with a stainless steel dress and a parade through the city that was disrupted by the always reliable train crossings.

a75f1a3a-6fad-4a2d-bc0a-ccc253c267ed

It’s interesting thinking about you during this time. I bet you looked a lot different, not so out of place. The memory of the horse racing and the big events that took place had probably not faded in the five years you’d closed your doors. I bet inside you were more authentic, more like you were intended to look.9ef91673-cab5-46a4-ae0d-f834496b8c95

Nonetheless, back to Expo 69. A lot of companies seemed to have walked out of the expo with success. Curtis’ for example is now a big Lincolnshire company and they were selling pork pies at the expo 45 years ago. It unbelievable that one event could kick start a company like that. I’m sure there was a lot of work else where also but it’s nice to think that the expo really befitted companies that are still around today.

fa01d7e4-3108-418b-b632-9b7c050cbacb

See you soon.                                                                                                             Best Wishes,                                                                                                              Alice Dale.

 

A Letter to the Grandstand.

Dear Grandstand,

Yesterday, at the archives, I saw a lot of your history.  I saw plans for you, I saw what you could have been.  Then I learned about the expo of ’69 and I thought about how brilliant it was that you got to be part of something like that (after all why would I be learning about it if it wasn’t to do with you).  After closer inspection of the map of the expo and reading the articles, I discovered that you actually weren’t part of it.

Lucky you, being part of the West Common, getting to look at all the fun that could be had.  But you weren’t part of it were you, Grandstand?  Ever since they stopped the races all you have been is a sequence of plans and what ifs.  At least if you had been used as a mortuary you would have served a purpose.

So back to the expo, with all its wonder, and colour, and fun – did it make you sad?  Did it make you realise how insignificant you are?

Yours Sincerely,

Katherine Copley.

Exploring the Space… Five Places – Fifty (ish) Words

Small cupboard down the stairs… Dusty, cold, dark, musty,echoes, orange, hurts to breathe in cold air, spiders webs, dark corners, rough, cold to touch, peeling paint, storage, juxtaposition of whats in the room to what it looks like, eerie, bare bricks, dirty, molding wood, old, claustrophobia, ghosts, ugly, neglected, dead and needs care.

Room with painting… Fireplace, rough and smooth, cold to touch, royal, patriotic, classy, old, used, worn, historic, mystery and memory, stage, 1917, 1930s/40s brickwork, A.M Hunter 2nd, beautiful painting and cold.

By the road… Noisy, disturbing, out of place, fields and pollution, spectacular views,horses, old,undisturbed, historic, performance, regal, open but fenced off, gated away, restricted, dated architecture.

Large main room… Mix of old and new, bright, warm and cold, light, out of place, airy, dusty, sloped roof, original and modified, individual mortuary, smells musty, damp, broken up by pillars, antique and tall.

Old kitchen… Damp, cold, musty, antique, memories and mystery, historic,old, smells old and dirty, unused, unhygienic, dark, spiders webs, unappreciated and un-kept.

No present without the past.

After reading The Handbook To Drifting (extracts) (Smith, 2010) I tried to look at the Grandstand in a new way.  My intention was to forget about the sentiment and memory contained in the site and look at it with the point of view that if I wasn’t part of the Grandstand’s past, why should I hold it so dear when trying to feel a response from the site.  The third instruction in this ‘guidebook’ was to use your senses, to “walk slowly and look for meaning in everything.”

When you explore the exterior of the Grandstand it is more achievable to think about what you can see and how your senses are engaging in terms of the present,  however when you explore the interior there is one particular spot where you can’t really forget the past.

The RAF emblem over a fireplace in one of the main rooms leaves very little else in your mind when trying to place the grandstand in terms of its meaning.  The meaning that you find here is that the grandstand played a part in the war and assisted the Royal Air Force in the Lincolnshire area.  You can understand the difficulty I might have in trying not to think about the past.

P1020804

Another instruction in the guide to drifting particularly interested me and that was number 22: “When you encounter strangers, LISTEN to them.” I think it would be very interesting to go out and ask people what their opinions on the grandstand are and yet this would also counteract my new found ideal of not dwelling in the past.  I think what I’m trying to say is that people can not form an opinion of the grandstand if they don’t know what it is, or where it is, or if they’ve never seen a picture of it.  In order for them to express their feelings they have to know it, and this inevitably means knowing about its past.

I like to think that my attempted ‘drift’ in which I had an aim (not sure that’s exactly the point) failed to a point that I now understand more than ever that without the past we literally wouldn’t have a thing, therefore why on earth should I try and make any of that past irrelevant?

Works Cited:
Smith, P. 2010. Mythogeography. Axminster, Devon: Triarchy Press.